

Takeda walked away from an eight-year, $150M neuroscience partnership with Denali Therapeutics, handing back a promising dementia drug with no safety concerns. The reason? "Strategic considerations." Now Denali has to go it alone with nearly $1B in cash and Phase 1/2 data coming this year.
Imagine spending eight years building something with a partner, only to get a "we need to talk" message on a Thursday. That's essentially what happened to Denali Therapeutics on April 3, when Takeda called to say it was walking away from their neurodegenerative disease collaboration.
The asset in question: DNL593, a drug designed to treat a rare, devastating form of dementia called frontotemporal dementia (FTD-GRN). The partnership started back in January 2018, with Takeda ponying up $150 million upfront and the promise of milestone payments. Now? Takeda's handing back the keys, the intellectual property, and basically saying, "Good luck out there."
The kicker: this had nothing to do with the drug failing. No safety red flags. No ugly data. Takeda framed the decision as "strategic considerations," which is corporate-speak for "we've got other priorities now."
Getting drugs into the brain is one of the hardest problems in medicine. The blood-brain barrier acts like a bouncer at an exclusive nightclub, blocking roughly 98% of molecules from entering. Most drugs simply can't get past it.
Denali built a clever workaround called the Transport Vehicle (TV) platform. Think of it like a VIP badge that tricks the bouncer into letting large therapeutic molecules through the door. The platform hijacks a natural process called receptor-mediated transcytosis, essentially hitching a ride on the brain's own delivery trucks.
DNL593 uses this technology to ferry a protein called progranulin into the brains of patients with FTD-GRN. These patients have a genetic mutation that leaves them deficient in progranulin, causing toxic buildup in brain cells and progressive dementia. There are currently zero approved disease-modifying treatments for FTD-GRN.
And the TV platform isn't just theoretical anymore. In March 2026, the FDA approved Denali's Avlayah (tividenofusp alfa) for Hunter syndrome, making it the first therapy to use this brain-crossing technology in an approved product. That's a powerful proof of concept.

Sanofi's bispecific antibody lunsekimig crushed its respiratory trials in asthma and nasal polyps, then face-planted in eczema. The split verdict reveals why building one drug to rule multiple diseases is biotech's hardest trick.


Join thousands of biotech professionals who start their day with our free, daily briefing.
Takeda isn't abandoning neuroscience entirely, at least not on paper. The company still lists neurodegeneration, rare neurology, and orexin science as core focus areas. But actions speak louder than pipeline slides.
On March 25, 2026, Takeda's board approved a massive restructuring designed to deliver more than $1.25 billion in annualized savings by 2028. The plan involves flattening management layers, automating tasks with AI, and streamlining corporate functions. Translation: cut costs everywhere and double down on the programs most likely to pay off.
This isn't Takeda's first exit from Denali's pipeline, either. A previous collaboration asset called DNL919, a TREM2 agonist aimed at Alzheimer's, was placed on FDA clinical hold in January 2022, which was later lifted. The program was ultimately discontinued in August 2023 after Phase 1 data revealed a frustratingly narrow therapeutic window. That earlier failure likely colored Takeda's appetite for continued CNS risk.
With the DNL593 termination, all remaining collaborations between the two companies are now over. Eight years, and nothing to show for it.
To Denali's credit, the company seems unfazed. CEO Ryan Watts expressed confidence in the science behind DNL593 and committed to advancing the program independently.
The numbers support that confidence, at least for now. Denali has a significant cash runway. The ongoing Phase 1/2 trial for DNL593 has already completed enrollment with 40 patients, and data is expected by the end of 2026. No new money needs to be raised, no desperate partnering deals need to happen tomorrow.
Wall Street seemed to agree. Denali's stock actually rose on the day of the announcement. Investors apparently viewed the clean exit (no termination fees, no messy financial obligations) as manageable rather than catastrophic.
But analysts aren't unanimous. Losing Takeda means losing its funding, its regulatory expertise, and its 50/50 commercialization rights in the U.S. If the Phase 1/2 data looks promising and Denali needs to run a larger, more expensive trial, that cash pile will shrink fast without a partner to share the bill.
Takeda isn't the only big pharma company getting cold feet about brain diseases. The last two years have seen a quiet but unmistakable pattern.
Roche ended its Alzheimer's collaboration with UCB and returned two failed assets to AC Immune. Johnson & Johnson killed programs targeting Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. AstraZeneca shut down its entire neuroscience research group, pulling experimental drugs for Alzheimer's, migraine, and pain. Sage Therapeutics halted a Parkinson's program after a mid-stage failure. Otsuka walked away from a Phase III Alzheimer's agitation drug.
That's a lot of exits.
Analysts at Mizuho have pushed back on the "mass retreat" narrative, arguing these are individual clinical failures rather than a coordinated industry strategy. And they have a point: Sanofi acquired Vigil Neuroscience in May 2025, adding a TREM2-targeting Alzheimer's asset to its pipeline after a $40 million strategic investment the year before. The overall Alzheimer's development pipeline actually expanded in 2025 compared to the prior year.
So it's not that pharma has given up on the brain. It's more like natural selection: companies are getting ruthless about which bets survive.
The immediate future for DNL593 comes down to one thing: data. Denali expects Phase 1/2 results, including biomarker readouts, by the end of this year. If the drug shows meaningful progranulin delivery and biological activity in patient brains, the partnership offers will come knocking.
If the data disappoints? Well, Denali still has a validated drug delivery platform and an FDA-approved product in Avlayah. The company isn't a one-trick pony.
For Takeda, the question is whether its restructuring math actually works. Cutting $1.25 billion in costs only makes sense if you're reinvesting that money into programs that deliver. Neuroscience was supposed to be one of those areas. Walking away from a Phase 1/2 asset with no safety concerns suggests the company either lost confidence in FTD-GRN as a commercial opportunity or decided rare dementia wasn't worth the risk relative to other pipeline bets.
Either way, Denali is on its own now. For a company that just got its first drug approved, that might not be the worst thing in the world.
A computer just designed a new opioid addiction drug that doesn't touch opioid receptors at all. GATC Health's AI-generated candidate is heading into human trials, and it could signal a turning point for a field that's been stuck for decades.