

Novartis's top-selling heart drug lost half its sales to generics in Q2 2026, yet the company beat profit estimates by 12%. The secret: cost discipline, surging cancer drugs, and a kidney disease strategy that's quietly becoming a competitive fortress.
Imagine your highest-paid employee quits, and somehow you still hit your quarterly targets. That's basically what Novartis just pulled off.
The Swiss pharma giant reported Q2 2026 earnings last week, and the headline number was ugly: Entresto, its blockbuster heart failure drug, saw sales crater 50% year-over-year. That's a billion-dollar-plus hole in the income statement compared to the same quarter last year. And yet, Novartis beat analyst expectations on profit by a wide margin. Shares climbed more than 2% on the news.
How do you lose half of your best-seller and still come out ahead? Cost discipline, a deep bench of newer drugs, and a kidney franchise that's quietly becoming a competitive weapon.
Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) was a monster. At its peak in 2025, the heart failure drug pulled in roughly $7.8 billion in annual sales, making it the single biggest revenue driver in Novartis's portfolio. It accounted for about 14% of total company sales.
Then the U.S. patents expired. Generic competitors flooded in starting mid-2025, and the erosion has been brutal. Q1 2026 sales dropped 42%. Q2 was worse: down 50% to $1.18 billion, actually missing analyst estimates of around $1.3 billion.
This is the classic "patent cliff" that Big Pharma companies dread, and Entresto's fall follows the textbook pattern for small-molecule drugs. Think of it like a restaurant losing its lease on a prime location. Overnight, cheaper competitors set up shop on the same block. Customers don't stay loyal when the generic version costs a fraction of the price.
The pain isn't over, either. Entresto's European patent exclusivity starts to lapse in November 2026. Management expects the second-half decline to be "less steep" than the first, but that's a low bar when you've already lost half your sales. Novartis has penciled in roughly a $4 billion total revenue hit from patent losses in 2026, with Entresto as the biggest contributor.

Samsung Biologics just dropped $1.8 billion on a Swiss peptide manufacturer, making the largest pharma M&A in South Korean history. The target: PolyPeptide Group, a company sitting on exactly what the GLP-1 boom desperately needs.


Join thousands of biotech professionals who start their day with our free, daily briefing.
Despite the Entresto carnage, the overall numbers looked surprisingly solid. Net sales came in at $14.4 billion, up 3% in dollars and 1% at constant currency. Not exactly fireworks, but well above the consensus estimate of approximately $14.0 billion.
The real surprise was profitability. Core operating income hit $5.94 billion, beating the Street's forecast of $5.31 billion by about 12%. The core operating margin landed at 41.2%, a full 2.4 percentage points above what analysts expected. Core earnings per share came in at $2.41 versus consensus of $2.42, a narrow miss.
So where did the extra profit come from? Lower-than-expected costs on both the sales side and R&D were a big part of the story. Post-Sandoz spinoff, Novartis runs a leaner, higher-margin operation focused purely on innovative medicines. The restructuring is paying dividends (sometimes literally; the company announced a $10 billion buyback in July 2025).
But Jefferies threw some cold water on the celebration. The investment bank noted that more than half of the sales beat came from "phasing in established brands" rather than true underlying demand growth. Translation: some revenue got pulled forward, and Novartis itself expects to give that back in Q3. It's like celebrating a great month of tips, only to realize half of them were from one table that won't be coming back.
While Entresto bleeds out, a roster of newer drugs is picking up the slack. Kisqali (breast cancer) grew 43% in Q2. Scemblix (a targeted leukemia therapy) surged 89%. Kesimpta (multiple sclerosis), Pluvicto (prostate cancer), and Leqvio (cholesterol) all contributed meaningful growth.
This is the core of Novartis's post-cliff strategy: don't try to replace one megablockbuster with another single drug. Instead, build a diversified portfolio across four therapeutic areas (cardiovascular/renal, oncology, neuroscience, immunology) so no single patent expiration can sink the ship.
Perhaps the most interesting subplot in the earnings story is Novartis's growing dominance in kidney disease, specifically IgA nephropathy (IgAN), a chronic condition where the immune system attacks the kidneys.
Novartis now has two approved drugs for IgAN and a third in late-stage trials:
The competitive moat here is structural. Fabhalta targets complement-driven inflammation. Vanrafia addresses blood flow and scarring in the kidney's filtering units. Zigakibart goes after the root immune dysfunction. Three drugs, three different mechanisms, one disease. Rivals like Travere, Vertex, and AstraZeneca are mostly pursuing single-mechanism approaches.
It's the pharmaceutical equivalent of playing chess while your opponents play checkers. If the Phase 3 zigakibart data lands, Novartis could offer sequencing or even combination strategies that no competitor can match.
The Entresto cliff is a dress rehearsal for what's coming next. Cosentyx and Kisqali face potential patent expirations in the early 2030s. Novartis is betting that its technology platforms (radioligand therapy, RNA therapeutics, gene therapy) and a pipeline with 15-plus potential approvals or pivotal readouts by 2026 will keep revenue growing at 5-6% annually from 2025 through 2030.
That's ambitious. But this quarter showed the playbook can work, at least in the short term. Lose your biggest drug, tighten the belt, lean on the bench players, and keep Wall Street happy enough to not panic.
The real test comes when the phasing benefits fade in Q3 and European generics start chipping away at whatever Entresto revenue remains. Novartis has bought itself time. Whether it's bought enough depends on how many of those pipeline bets actually pay off.
Former LifeMD employees allege clinicians had just two minutes per patient to prescribe powerful GLP-1 weight-loss drugs. The STAT News investigation puts Novo Nordisk's entire telehealth strategy under a harsh spotlight.