

Merck is spending $6.7 billion on a cancer drug that's still in early trials, and the logic behind it says everything about how desperate Big Pharma gets when a $30 billion product is about to lose patent protection.
Two years ago, Terns Pharmaceuticals was a small-cap biotech quietly pivoting away from liver disease toward cancer. Last week, Merck wrote them a check for $6.7 billion. That's not a typo. And the drug at the center of this deal? It's still in early-stage clinical trials.
Welcome to the most desperate, most expensive game of musical chairs in pharma: what happens when your best-selling drug is about to lose patent protection, and you need to find the next one before the music stops.
Keytruda is Merck's crown jewel. It's the world's top-selling cancer drug, pulling in over $30 billion in 2025 alone. That's more than a third of Merck's entire revenue. If Keytruda were a country's GDP, it would rank ahead of Iceland.
But Keytruda's patents start expiring in 2028, and cheaper copycat versions (called biosimilars) are already lining up at the door. When biosimilars hit the market, they typically slash prices by 50 percent or more and grab market share fast. For a drug generating $30 billion a year, even a modest erosion means billions evaporating from the balance sheet.
Merck's 2026 sales guidance of $65.5 to $67 billion already came in below analyst expectations, a sign the cliff's shadow is getting longer. CEO Robert M. Davis has been blunt about the strategy: grow through the patent loss by buying the next generation of drugs before someone else does.
The centerpiece of the Terns deal is a drug called TERN-701, a treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a type of blood cancer. Specifically, it's an allosteric BCR-ABL inhibitor, which is a fancy way of saying it blocks a protein that drives certain leukemia cells to grow out of control. Think of it like jamming a wrench into a machine's gears; TERN-701 targets those gears from an unusual angle that existing drugs can't easily reach.
Merck's head of research, Dean Li, called TERN-701 "meaningfully differentiated" based on early clinical data, comparing its potential to Novartis's Scemblix, a drug already making waves in the CML space. The company is billing it as a "potential best-in-class candidate."

Kailera Therapeutics raised nearly $1 billion in private funding before most people knew its name. Now the obesity-focused biotech is going public, and its IPO could reveal whether Wall Street's love affair with weight-loss drugs still has room to grow.


Join thousands of biotech professionals who start their day with our free, daily briefing.
That said, TERN-701 is still in Phase 1/2 trials (the CARDINAL study), meaning it has proven it's safe enough to keep testing but hasn't yet run the large, definitive trials needed for FDA approval. Pivotal dose selection isn't expected until mid-2026, with updated data coming in the second half of the year. There's a lot of road left to travel.
Merck is paying $53 per share in all cash, a 31% premium over Terns' 60-day average stock price and a whopping 42% premium over its 90-day average. After accounting for cash on Terns' balance sheet, the net price lands around $5.7 billion.
Merck expects to take a $5.8 billion charge (roughly $2.35 per share) when the deal closes, likely in Q2 2026. That's not unusual for acquisitions of this size; it reflects the accounting reality of buying a company whose lead drug is still years from generating revenue. Both boards have approved the deal, and it's now waiting on standard antitrust clearance and a shareholder tender.
Perhaps the wildest part of this saga is Terns itself. The company started life chasing NASH treatments (now called MASH), a massive liver disease market that has attracted billions in R&D dollars. Terns had a thyroid hormone receptor agonist called TERN-501 in development for MASH, but the program never made it past "Phase 2 ready" status.
At some point, Terns' leadership made a bold call: pivot to oncology. They bet the company on TERN-701 and its CML program. That bet turned a small-cap stock into a $53 acquisition target. One analyst called it "a masterclass in strategic adaptability." CEO Amy Burroughs framed the Merck deal as a chance to leverage the pharma giant's infrastructure to push TERN-701 through large-scale trials faster than Terns could alone.
As for the leftover metabolic assets (TERN-501 for MASH, TERN-801 for obesity)? They're still in Terns' portfolio. Merck could revive them, partner them out, or shelve them entirely. Given that the MASH market is projected to balloon from around $8 billion in 2024 to over $30 billion by 2033, those assets might be worth dusting off someday.
Terns is the latest in a string of acquisitions designed to fill the Keytruda-shaped hole in Merck's future. In November 2025, Merck bought Cidara Therapeutics for $9.2 billion, picking up a preventive influenza drug in Phase 3 trials. They also acquired Verona Pharma in 2025 for a marketed respiratory drug.
The pattern is clear: Merck is buying across oncology, infectious disease, and respiratory, spreading its bets rather than doubling down on a single therapeutic area. Davis has emphasized discipline in dealmaking. (Rumors of a $32 billion bid for Revolution Medicines circulated earlier, though nothing materialized.)
Merck's target? $70 billion in annual sales by the mid-2030s, essentially doubling down on the idea that you can acquire your way through a patent cliff if you buy smart and buy early.
Let's be honest about the risk here. Merck just paid $6.7 billion for a Phase 1/2 drug. That's like buying a restaurant based on the appetizer course alone. TERN-701 could be a blockbuster, or it could stumble in later trials the way countless promising cancer drugs have before.
But Merck doesn't have the luxury of waiting for certainty. When your biggest product is a ticking clock, you pay a premium for shots on goal. The 42% acquisition premium reflects that urgency. And if TERN-701 does deliver best-in-class CML data, this deal will look like a bargain in retrospect.
For now, Merck is betting that its deep pockets and clinical trial infrastructure can turn Terns' early promise into a marketed drug faster than a small biotech ever could. It's the pharma equivalent of a championship team trading draft picks for a star player who hasn't played a full season yet.
High risk, high conviction, and absolutely no time to waste.
Astellas pulled the plug on its STING inhibitor trial for Sjögren's syndrome before it could even generate human data. The decision says as much about a notoriously undruggable target as it does about where Big Pharma is placing its bets.