

A bipartisan group of senators wants to cap insulin at $35 per month for privately insured and uninsured Americans, finishing what the Inflation Reduction Act started. The bill could reshape drug pricing far beyond insulin.
For decades, insulin has been America's most absurd pricing story. A drug discovered over a century ago, essential for survival, controlled by three companies, and priced like a luxury good. That might finally be changing.
On March 25, a bipartisan group of senators introduced the INSULIN Act of 2026, a bill that would cap out-of-pocket insulin costs at $35 per month for anyone with private or employer-sponsored insurance. If it passes, the cap would kick in for plan year 2027. And the ripple effects could extend far beyond insulin.
The sponsors are an unlikely squad: Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Susan Collins (R-ME), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), and John Kennedy (R-LA). Two Democrats, two Republicans. In today's Washington, that alone is news.
Sort of. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 capped insulin at $35 per month for Medicare patients. That was a big deal for seniors, who use insulin at high rates (nearly 30% of Americans over 65 have diabetes). But it left a gaping hole: everyone else.
If you're on your employer's health plan or buying insurance through the Obamacare marketplace, you've been on your own. About 40 million Americans have diabetes, and millions of them aren't on Medicare. Some have been rationing doses to make vials last longer, which is roughly as safe as rationing parachute deployment on the way down.
The INSULIN Act plugs that hole. Starting in 2027, health plans would have to waive deductibles on insulin and limit what patients pay to $35 or 25% of the list price, whichever is less. By 2028, that formula tightens further: patients pay the lesser of $35 or 25% of the negotiated net price (the actual price after rebates, not the inflated sticker number).
One of the bill's more creative provisions targets the roughly 27 to 29 million Americans without any insurance at all. It creates a , funded by $100 million in fiscal year 2027, that would let community health centers sell insulin for no more than $35 per month.

CMR Surgical just launched its Versius Plus robotic system in the U.S., taking direct aim at Intuitive Surgical's $10 billion empire. With modular arms that roll between operating rooms and $1.4 billion in funding, this UK challenger is betting that hospitals are ready for a more flexible (and potentially cheaper) alternative.


Join thousands of biotech professionals who start their day with our free, daily briefing.
Senator Warnock pushed hard for this piece, pointing to his prior "Insulin Deserts" analysis with Senator Kennedy that identified areas where uninsured diabetics have the fewest options. The pilot also comes with an insulin resource hotline, because apparently in 2026, we still need a helpline to help people afford a drug that's been around since the 1920s.
If you've ever wondered why insulin costs so much when the underlying science isn't particularly new, allow me to introduce you to pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). These are the middlemen who negotiate drug prices between manufacturers and insurers, and they've long been accused of keeping list prices artificially high so they can pocket bigger rebates.
The INSULIN Act takes a swing at that. It would require PBMs to pass 100% of insulin rebates and discounts from manufacturers directly to plan sponsors. No more skimming off the top. Senator Collins specifically called out PBM reform as a priority, framing it as the key to reducing not just copays but actual premiums.
This provision dovetails with broader PBM reform Congress already signed into law. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026, signed in February, mandated full rebate pass-through and new transparency requirements for PBMs across Medicare and commercial markets, effective 2028-2029. The insulin bill extends that same philosophy to a specific, high-profile drug.
Here's the interesting part: the three companies that control roughly 90% of the U.S. insulin market (Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi) already moved in this direction voluntarily.
Back in March 2023, all three announced massive list price cuts. Lilly slashed Humalog by 70%. Novo Nordisk dropped NovoLog by 75%. Sanofi cut Lantus by 78%. Each company also introduced its own $35 per month cap for commercially insured patients at participating pharmacies.
So why does this bill matter if the companies already capped prices? Because voluntary programs can be reversed. A company can kill a discount program with a press release. A federal law is a different animal entirely. It locks in the floor and removes the option to quietly raise prices once the political heat fades.
Insulin is the test case. The warm-up act. The pilot episode before the full season order.
Congress has been inching toward broader drug pricing controls for years, and the INSULIN Act fits neatly into that trajectory. Medicare's drug price negotiation program under the IRA already produced at least 38% reductions from list prices for the first 10 drugs, saving Medicare an estimated $6 billion per year. A third round of 15 drugs is being negotiated now, with prices taking effect in 2028.
If Congress can cap insulin prices for private insurance and get bipartisan support, the template is set. Lawmakers on both sides could point to it as proof that price caps work without destroying the market. The bill even includes a federal study on market barriers and biosimilar adoption, essentially building the research case for future interventions.
A Democratic aide told reporters the sponsors are looking for additional co-sponsors and plan to attach the bill to must-pass legislation like tax extenders. That's the legislative equivalent of sneaking vegetables into a smoothie: if it rides along with something Congress has to pass anyway, the odds improve dramatically.
Twenty-nine states plus Washington, D.C. already cap insulin copays at somewhere between $25 and $100. The federal bill would create a nationwide standard, eliminating the patchwork. For patients who happen to live in a state without protections, that's the difference between affording medication and rationing it.
But the bigger question isn't about insulin at all. It's about whether this becomes the playbook. If a bipartisan group can cap the price of one drug category for private insurance and survive politically, every expensive drug with a broad patient population becomes a potential target.
The pharmaceutical industry hasn't publicly opposed this bill yet, perhaps because the major insulin makers already adopted similar caps voluntarily. But you can bet the lobbying machines are watching closely. If the INSULIN Act passes and becomes a template, the next bill might target a drug category where companies haven't been quite so cooperative.
For now, roughly 40 million Americans with diabetes are watching to see if Washington can finish what it started in 2022. The bipartisan support is real. The midterm pressure is real. And the precedent, if it happens, would be very real indeed.
The FDA approved Rocket Pharma's gene therapy Kresladi for a rare immune disorder that kills 75% of untreated kids before age two. The twist: the agency had already rejected it twice, and the drug's clinical results were never the problem.