

Samsung Bioepis just posted the first-ever Phase 3 data for a Keytruda copycat, and it matched the $32 billion original on every measure. With at least ten companies racing to build biosimilar versions of the world's best-selling drug, the countdown to cheaper cancer immunotherapy has officially begun.
Keytruda is the best-selling drug on the planet. Not the best-selling cancer drug. The best-selling drug, period. Merck pulled in $29.5 billion from it last year, more than the entire GDP of Iceland. And now, for the first time, a company has posted Phase 3 data showing its knockoff version works just as well.
Samsung Bioepis just dropped positive results from both a Phase 1 and Phase 3 trial of SB-27, its proposed biosimilar to Keytruda (pembrolizumab). Both studies hit their primary goals. The copycat matched the original on drug exposure, tumor response rates, safety, and immune reactions.
This is the opening shot in what could become the most consequential biosimilar race in history.
Think of biosimilars like generic drugs, but for biologics (the complex, protein-based medicines made in living cells). Unlike a simple pill you can reverse-engineer with chemistry, biologics are enormous molecules that are nearly impossible to replicate exactly. So instead of proving the copy is identical, regulators require companies to prove it's close enough that patients won't notice a difference.
That's what Samsung Bioepis just did.
In the Phase 1 trial, 163 patients with early-stage lung cancer received either SB-27 or the real Keytruda (sourced from both the U.S. and Europe). The study measured how much drug got into patients' bloodstreams, a metric called AUC. SB-27 met the predefined equivalence criteria on all counts.
The Phase 3 trial was the bigger deal. It enrolled 555 patients with metastatic non-squamous lung cancer who had never been treated before. Half got SB-27; half got Keytruda. After 24 weeks, researchers compared objective response rates (basically, how many tumors shrank). The 90% confidence interval for the response rate ratio came in at 0.737 to 1.071, comfortably inside the equivalence window of 0.712 to 1.405.
In plain English: the biosimilar worked as well as Keytruda. Safety and immune responses looked comparable too.

China just added semaglutide to its essential medicines list, making it the second GLP-1 drug prioritized for the world's largest diabetes population. With 233 million patients, expiring patents, and a wave of domestic competitors, the move could reshape the global GLP-1 market in ways Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly didn't plan for.


Join thousands of biotech professionals who start their day with our free, daily briefing.
Samsung Bioepis is now the first company to disclose global Phase 3 data for a Keytruda biosimilar. That's a meaningful head start in a race with at least ten entrants.
The competition reads like a biotech all-star roster. Sandoz is running Phase 1 and Phase 3 trials with its candidate GME751. Celltrion has Phase 3 studies underway. Formycon, partnered with Zydus Lifesciences for North America, reported positive Phase 1 results in February 2026 and is pursuing a streamlined FDA pathway that might skip a full Phase 3 entirely. Alvotech teamed up with Dr. Reddy's in June 2025, though their candidate is still preclinical.
Then there's mAbxience, Bio-Thera Solutions, and Shanghai Henlius, all pushing their own programs forward.
Being first with data doesn't guarantee being first to market. But it does mean Samsung Bioepis can file for regulatory approval sooner, potentially submitting a U.S. application (called a 351(k) biosimilar filing) as early as this year. That positions them for a possible launch right around Keytruda's key U.S. patent expiration in 2028.
Merck knows what's coming. The company has been running one of pharma's most aggressive lifecycle playbooks to protect its crown jewel.
Keytruda's core U.S. patents for the IV formulation start expiring around 2028. In Europe, supplementary protection certificates push that date to 2031. Some U.S. patents technically extend to 2036, but the practical window for biosimilar competition opens much sooner.
So Merck faces a one-two punch of biosimilar competition and potential Medicare price controls arriving in quick succession.
Merck's counter-strategy? A new subcutaneous version called Keytruda Qlex, launched in 2025. It's a clever move. Biosimilar developers are building copies of IV Keytruda. A subcutaneous formulation is a different product with different patents, potentially keeping patients on the branded version even after IV biosimilars arrive. Think of it like switching from DVD to streaming right before someone builds a cheaper DVD player.
Analysts project Keytruda could reach roughly $35 billion in annual sales before meaningful competition hits. That's a lot of revenue to defend.
This is where the story gets genuinely exciting. Keytruda is extremely expensive for patients in the U.S. without broad insurance coverage. Biosimilars are expected to launch at 20 to 30% discounts, and those discounts tend to deepen as more competitors enter the market.
Scale biosimilar pricing globally, and you're talking about millions of cancer patients in middle-income countries gaining access to a therapy that was previously out of reach.
PD-1 inhibitors like Keytruda have genuinely transformed cancer treatment over the past decade. They work by helping the immune system recognize and attack tumors, a concept called checkpoint inhibition. The problem has never been whether they work; it's been whether health systems can afford them for everyone who might benefit.
Biosimilars could change that equation dramatically.
Zoom out and something fascinating is happening. The entire PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor class, which includes Bristol Myers Squibb's Opdivo, Roche's Tecentriq, and AstraZeneca's Imfinzi, is slowly transitioning from premium innovation to commodity backbone.
When biosimilars commoditize the foundation of immuno-oncology, the real value shifts upstream. Next-generation combinations, bispecific antibodies, and novel immune targets become the new frontier where companies can charge premium prices. The PD-1 inhibitor itself becomes the "generic backbone" that everything else gets stacked on top of.
For Samsung Bioepis, the clinical risk on SB-27 now looks low. The remaining hurdles are regulatory timelines, patent litigation outcomes, and commercial execution. No approved Keytruda biosimilar exists in any major market yet. 2026 is the year of filing; 2028 is the year of launching.
But after this week's data, the countdown to cheaper Keytruda officially started. And for the world's best-selling drug, that clock is ticking loud.
BMS's precision combo of Krazati plus cetuximab shrank colorectal tumors at nearly three times the rate of chemotherapy, yet patients didn't live a single day longer. The confirmatory trial failure threatens an accelerated approval and raises hard questions about targeted therapy's limits in GI cancers.