

Cytokinetics just filed a preemptive patent lawsuit against Bristol Myers Squibb, claiming BMS patented methods covering Cytokinetics' own heart drug despite having "zero involvement" in its development. With a billion-dollar drug class on the line, this fight could reshape the future of cardiac myosin inhibitors.
Imagine helping someone build a house, watching them move in, then finding out they got a patent on the front door you designed yourself. That's roughly the energy of what's happening between Cytokinetics and Bristol Myers Squibb right now.
On August 13, Cytokinetics filed a federal lawsuit in Delaware against BMS and its subsidiary MyoKardia. The claim: BMS obtained a patent covering methods of treating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a condition where the heart muscle gets abnormally thick, using techniques that Cytokinetics says cover its own drug. The kicker? Cytokinetics alleges BMS had "zero involvement" in that drug's discovery, development, or commercialization.
The drug in question is MYQORZO (aficamten), Cytokinetics' first-ever approved medicine. And the patent it's fighting is U.S. Patent No. 12,616,697.
To understand why this lawsuit stings, you need a quick history lesson.
Cytokinetics didn't just stumble into heart drugs. The company helped develop the science behind cardiac myosin inhibitors, a class of drugs that work by dialing down how hard the heart muscle squeezes. That early work fed into a program at a company called MyoKardia, which developed mavacamten, later branded as Camzyos.
Then in November 2020, BMS acquired MyoKardia. Camzyos got FDA approval in 2022 and became BMS's flagship product in HCM. Meanwhile, Cytokinetics went off and built its own cardiac myosin inhibitor: aficamten. That drug cleared Phase 3 trials in 2023 and received FDA approval in 2025.
So these two companies share scientific DNA. They emerged from the same intellectual tradition. And now they're suing each other in federal court. It's like watching two siblings fight over Grandma's recipe.
The lawsuit isn't just posturing. Cytokinetics is asking the court for four specific things:
First, a declaration that MYQORZO does not infringe any valid claim of the '697 patent. Second, a ruling that the patent claims are altogether. Third, injunctions that would stop BMS and MyoKardia from threatening or launching infringement suits against Cytokinetics or its commercial partners. And fourth, attorneys' fees.

Bristol Myers Squibb just signed a deal worth up to $15.2 billion with China's Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, covering 13 early-stage drug programs. It's one of the year's biggest cross-border pharma transactions, and it's happening despite U.S.-China tensions that should theoretically make deals like this impossible.


Join thousands of biotech professionals who start their day with our free, daily briefing.
Cytokinetics also demanded a jury trial on any triable issues. They're not tiptoeing around this.
The strategic logic is clear: MYQORZO hit U.S. pharmacies in January 2026. It's gaining commercial traction. The last thing Cytokinetics needs is a patent cloud hanging over its launch, scaring off doctors, payers, and partners. Filing this suit is essentially a preemptive strike, getting out ahead of any potential infringement action from BMS.
This fight matters because the cardiac myosin inhibitor market isn't some niche backwater. Depending on how you slice the numbers, the HCM therapeutics market sits somewhere between $593 million and $1.48 billion in 2026. And cardiac myosin inhibitors are the fastest-growing drug class within it.
Right now, the competitive landscape is basically a two-horse race. BMS has Camzyos. Cytokinetics has MYQORZO. Both drugs carry a REMS requirement (a special safety monitoring program) because of the risk of heart failure from too much suppression of heart function. Both are approved for symptomatic obstructive HCM.
It's a duopoly, and duopolies tend to get messy. When two players control an entire drug class, every competitive advantage matters: pricing, physician relationships, clinical data, label expansions. And intellectual property. Especially intellectual property.
If BMS could successfully assert its patent against MYQORZO, it could theoretically restrict Cytokinetics' commercial freedom. That's the nightmare scenario for Cytokinetics investors, and exactly why the company went on offense.
Analysts reacted to the lawsuit with something between a shrug and a thumbs-up for Cytokinetics. H.C. Wainwright reiterated a Buy rating with a $140 price target, saying it doesn't expect the litigation to affect MYQORZO's commercial momentum. Barclays raised its target to $110 from $95, citing strong MYQORZO sales that beat estimates. Citizens bumped its target to $110 from $105.
The consensus? This is Cytokinetics playing defense to protect a successful launch, not a sign that something is going wrong.
That said, patent litigation is inherently unpredictable. Delaware patent cases can drag on for years, and outcomes swing on highly technical claim construction arguments that even experienced patent attorneys can't predict with confidence. The market is pricing in a favorable outcome for Cytokinetics right now, but courts don't always cooperate with analyst models.
Zoom out for a second. Cardiac myosin inhibitors are still a young drug class. Cytokinetics isn't just defending MYQORZO; it's also developing CK-586, another cardiac myosin inhibitor aimed at heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (a different type of heart failure). The company's pipeline strategy depends on freedom to operate in this therapeutic space.
If BMS's patent holds up, it could cast a shadow over not just MYQORZO but future cardiac myosin programs too. That would give BMS a kind of toll-booth position in the drug class: anyone who wants to develop a cardiac myosin inhibitor for HCM might need to navigate around BMS's intellectual property.
Conversely, if Cytokinetics wins and the patent is invalidated, BMS loses a potential competitive weapon and the playing field stays open. For patients, that's probably the better outcome; competition tends to drive both innovation and access.
This lawsuit is about more than two companies arguing over a patent number. It's about who gets to own the future of a billion-dollar drug class that's still in its early innings. Cytokinetics built MYQORZO from the ground up and doesn't intend to let a late-arriving patent claim get in the way. BMS, sitting on a broadly approved global franchise with Camzyos, has its own interests to protect.
The case will play out in a Delaware courtroom over months (probably years). But the real verdict will show up in prescription volumes, market share, and whether Cytokinetics can keep building momentum without legal distractions. For now, the company is betting that the best defense is a very public, very aggressive offense.
Reports claim FDA Commissioner Marty Makary personally tried to block KalVista's rare disease drug, an almost unprecedented intervention that raises uncomfortable questions about political influence at the agency. The drug got approved anyway, but the fallout is just beginning.