

UCB's Bimzelx just beat AbbVie's Skyrizi in a head-to-head psoriatic arthritis trial, posting the first-ever biologic superiority win on a major joint endpoint. The results could reshape how doctors pick treatments in a $13 billion market.
For years, the conventional wisdom in autoimmune medicine has been simple: IL-23 inhibitors are the future. They're clean, convenient, and wildly effective at clearing skin. AbbVie's Skyrizi became the poster child for that thesis, racking up billions in sales across psoriasis and Crohn's disease. Rheumatologists were increasingly reaching for it in psoriatic arthritis, too.
Then UCB ran the receipts.
In a Phase 3b head-to-head study called BE BOLD, UCB's Bimzelx (bimekizumab) went toe-to-toe with Skyrizi (risankizumab) in 684 adults with active psoriatic arthritis. The primary endpoint was ACR50 at Week 16, which measures whether patients hit at least a 50% improvement across a basket of joint and inflammation markers. It's a tough bar to clear.
Bimzelx cleared it better. The drug posted a 49.1% response rate versus 38.4% for Skyrizi (p=0.0078). That's a statistically significant win, and it makes Bimzelx the first biologic ever to demonstrate head-to-head superiority on a major joint endpoint against another advanced biologic in psoriatic arthritis.
The speed gap was even more dramatic. At just four weeks in, 19.9% of Bimzelx patients had already achieved ACR50. Only 7.2% of Skyrizi patients could say the same. If psoriatic arthritis treatment were a drag race, Bimzelx had already crossed the finish line while Skyrizi was still shifting gears.
Think of the immune system's inflammation pathway like a river. IL-23 is upstream: it's the signal that tells certain immune cells to multiply and produce troublemaking proteins called IL-17A and IL-17F. Skyrizi works by damming the river at the source, blocking IL-23 so fewer of those downstream troublemakers get made.
Bimzelx takes a different approach. Instead of going upstream, it parks itself at the river's mouth and catches IL-17A and IL-17F directly, no matter where they came from. That "no matter where" part is the key.
Some immune cells produce IL-17 without any help from IL-23 at all. Gamma-delta T cells at the entheses (where tendons meet bone) are a prime example. Blocking IL-23 doesn't touch their output. Bimzelx does. This is especially relevant in psoriatic arthritis, where inflammation at entheses and joints involves IL-23-independent sources of IL-17.

A gene-edited pig kidney just kept a man alive and off dialysis for 271 days, shattering every record in xenotransplantation. With FDA approval for an expanded trial in hand, eGenesis is turning science fiction into a real answer for the 90,000 Americans stuck on the kidney transplant waiting list.


Join thousands of biotech professionals who start their day with our free, daily briefing.
It's the difference between cutting off a factory's power supply versus intercepting every truck leaving the loading dock. Both reduce delivery, but only one catches the trucks that have their own generators.
Bimzelx's joint victory was clear. The skin story is murkier. A key secondary endpoint combined ACR50 with PASI100 (complete skin clearance) at Week 16. Bimzelx posted 33.5% versus 24.4% for Skyrizi, a numerical advantage. But it didn't reach statistical significance in the study's hierarchical testing framework (nominal p=0.0800).
That matters because Skyrizi's bread and butter has always been skin. AbbVie can argue that while Bimzelx won the joint fight, the overall "skin plus joints" picture is less definitive. Expect that talking point on the next earnings call.
On safety, the two drugs looked broadly similar. Overall side effects hit 57% of Bimzelx patients versus 52% on Skyrizi. Serious side effects were actually lower with Bimzelx (1.8% vs. 2.9%). The expected trade-off: mild yeast infections (candidiasis) were more common with Bimzelx, a known IL-17 class effect. None were serious, none systemic, and none caused patients to stop treatment.
The global psoriatic arthritis treatment market sits at roughly $11 to $13 billion in 2025, growing at around 9% annually. Biologics account for more than half of that spending. Within the biologic world, TNF inhibitors like Humira still hold the largest chunk by volume, but they're shrinking thanks to biosimilar competition.
The real war is between IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for the non-TNF crown. And until now, momentum had been shifting toward IL-23. Rheumatologists loved Skyrizi's convenient dosing (every 12 weeks) and sterling safety profile. Dermatologists loved its skin clearance rates. AbbVie's commercial machine was doing what AbbVie's commercial machine always does.
BE BOLD throws a wrench into that narrative. For patients where joint control is the priority, particularly those with significant enthesitis, dactylitis, or axial symptoms, UCB now has the only head-to-head superiority data in the category. That's a powerful card to play in formulary negotiations and physician education.
Bimzelx was already having a moment. The drug crossed €2.2 billion in 2025 sales, more than tripling its prior-year revenue. It's approved across psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and hidradenitis suppurativa.
The BE BOLD win adds fuel to an already hot franchise. It also puts pressure on Novartis (Cosentyx) and Eli Lilly (Taltz), the two established IL-17A inhibitors. Neither has head-to-head PsA superiority data against an IL-23 inhibitor. Bimzelx's dual IL-17A/F mechanism gives it a theoretical edge within its own class, and now there's clinical evidence to back it up.
For AbbVie, the damage is probably containable. Skyrizi's biggest revenue drivers are psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease, not PsA. Analysts are unlikely to slash total Skyrizi forecasts over a single indication. But at the margins, especially among rheumatologists choosing a biologic for joint-dominant disease, share will shift.
Janssen's Tremfya (guselkumab), the other major IL-23 in PsA, catches indirect fire too. No head-to-head data against Bimzelx exists, but the class narrative now tilts toward IL-17A/F for joint outcomes.
For years, the treatment algorithm in psoriatic arthritis has been vibes-based as much as evidence-based. TNF first because we've used it longest; then pick IL-17 or IL-23 depending on whether the patient's joints or skin are worse. Comorbidities like inflammatory bowel disease (where IL-17 can be risky) or axial disease (where IL-23 is weak) nudge the decision further.
BE BOLD doesn't rewrite the entire playbook. IL-23 inhibitors still have important niches: patients with IBD risk, those who value infrequent dosing, and cases where skin is the dominant problem. But for the substantial population of PsA patients whose joints are screaming, UCB just handed rheumatologists a data-backed reason to reach for Bimzelx first.
Full secondary endpoint data, including longer-term joint responses and detailed skin outcomes, are expected later in 2026. That's when we'll know whether this is a moment or a movement.
Exact Sciences launched Cancerguard, a $689 blood test that screens for 50+ cancer types from a single draw. It's a massive bet on liquid biopsy screening, but the mortality data gap and lack of FDA approval raise big questions about what "early detection" really means in practice.